Role of Federal State and Local Governmentsâ€Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss the role of federal, state, and local governments, rhe role of providers. Answer: Healthcare system is a system, where, therapeutic, diagnostic, and preventive measures are taken in response to maintenance, rehabilitative, palliative and mental care. Certain problems have raised in this present health care in United States, like increased mortality and morbidity rate and decreased life expectations in human being. It is also noticed that rural areas are not getting proper treatment. To overcome this situation, this healthcare system should be designed in such a way that it should be associated with dispensing and sale of equipment, device or drug or equipment and other things to the prescription. The people, who will play vital roles in this healthcare system in the United States, are, federal, state, and local governments, insurance companies, employers, providers, consumers. It is very necessary to understand their roles. Role of federal, state, and local governments: In this newly designed healthcare system, the role of the federal, state, and local governments will be played in such a way, that the rural and undeveloped areas can get more health facilities. This change can be done in various ways, through influencing or determining key system components, like, provider and information infrastructures, quality of care, insurance coverage etc. This influences these components in their roles as conveners, collaborators, planners, analysts, regulators and purchasers as well as providers of technical and information assistance (Zimlichman et al., 2013). In spite of their activity, there is a little systematic effort to spread innovations, learn from their choices and to monitor states in between states and local areas. The federal government will play the central role in the healthcare sector. To increase the level of the quality of the organization, the federal government has to peruse consistent practices and policies and common aims for the advanc ement in rural healthcare functions. The federal government will utilize the advantages of its position as sponsor of applied health services, health care provider, health care purchaser and regulator. The role of insurance companies: Generally, the insurance companies financially support the demands of the healthcare organization. It also helps the patients to get financial support to carry the high expenses of any treatment (Berwick Hackbarth, 2012). This healthcare system will be designed in such a way that along with the local patients, the rural people and the families with more unemployed members will get the insurance facility. The insurance companies will focus on children and older people. The role of employers: Employers will play a vital role in this newly designed healthcare system for their employees through their decisions, their negotiations with health plans and direct efforts to institute system change related to the layout of the health benefits (Burwell, 2015). Employers can provide certain facilities, like incentives to the employees in critical care. The employers of the new health care system can also arrange for health camps in the area to provide most advanced treatment. In recent stability in healthcare, employers are showing concerns to employees about managing the care through less structured managed care plans. It offers out-of-network options or broader networks to providers. The role of providers: Any healthcare system is incomplete without the providers. There are many providers, who have great impacts in the healthcare system, like, drug suppliers, medical instrument suppliers, investors, etc. In the new healthcare system, the drug suppliers will be asked to provide more advanced drugs in low cost (Dubberke Olsen, 2012). It will help the people to get the treatment in minimal costs. The medical instrument suppliers will help this healthcare system through supplying the more advanced robotic instruments. The robotic instruments will lower down the manual effort. The Administrative health care providers will make an environment that shows response towards health care needs of the community. They also make connections between insurance companies and patients for payments and billing. The role of the consumers: The consumers will play a significant role in the health care system. They should considerably augment their influence on quality. In this designed plan, consumers are expected to decide among a various health plans. In most of the cases, consumers are not captivating on all of the behaviors expected of them. Consumers are expected to assume more duties for their lifestyles and behaviors (Legido-Quigley et al., 2013). They can also be active participants in the decision making process regarding the medical treatments. Moreover, it has been identified that consumers can be one of the best elements for improving functioning of the healthcare market place. The payment system: The payment system in the healthcare should be aligned in a way that equal value can be distributed among the patients. More focus will be given to the rural people in payment system through providing free of cost treatment. The proposed healthcare model should pay certain values and acknowledgment to improve and bring about renovation in the healthcare system. Firstly, the healthcare professionals should be provided with incentives and reimbursement. Secondly, the health outcomes should be improved and service provided should be cheap (Chow et al., 2012). The affected cost barriers should be removed. There is a need to construct and design the principles of the value-based bundled payments to treat patients with the specific medical condition, and it covers all the drugs, procedures, tests, and services. The advantage: The new healthcare model would be designed in such a way that it would benefit the patient by their service and high quality treatment. The new model would implement new robotic tools and technologies for providing better treatment (Berwick Hackbarth, 2012). The health professionals employed would be given proper training. The management team would be highly skilled in monitoring the discrepancies in the system. It will also provide the treatment to the patients after staying in home. Moreover, the healthcare system should work in collaboration with the government to get better funding and support. Criticism: The most significant criticism the opponents would be a matter related to insurance. The United States does not guarantee health coverage for any individual (Zimlichman et al., 2013). Thus, this can be a question raised. Moreover, the high cost of the treatment can be questioned by the critics regarding the medical treatments. Other criticism can be the treatment of the caregivers to the older patients. Sometimes, the caregivers couldnt provide proper care to the older patients during their hospital stay. Answering the criticisms: The competitors or the critics would have a lot of question-related to the medical facility and services. The answer to such questions would include that highly used technology, and diverse medical services would be the reason for the high cost (Burwell, 2015). The treatment requires the devotion of a lot of time and use of potential tools required an investment of huge money. Thus, the service is costly. The criticisms can be avoided through meetings and gatherings. The communication and sharing thoughts can minimize the problems, which will automatically lower down the criticism. It is estimated that U.S. spent more than $8,608 on healthcare per capita. The demands of the healthcare system are increasing on a daily basis. Now days, the healthcare systems are becoming more web oriented. This existed healthcare system in U.S. has certain problems. Therefore, it is estimated that, the newly designed healthcare system with above-mentioned changes can provide most advanced treatment to the patients. References: Berwick, D. M., Hackbarth, A. D. (2012). Eliminating waste in US health care.Jama,307(14), 1513-1516. Burwell, S. M. (2015). Setting value-based payment goalsHHS efforts to improve US health care.N Engl J Med,372(10), 897-899. Chow, F. C., Regan, S., Feske, S., Meigs, J. B., Grinspoon, S. K., Triant, V. A. (2012). Comparison of ischemic stroke incidence in HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected patients in a US health care system.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999),60(4), 351. Dubberke, E. R., Olsen, M. A. (2012). Burden of Clostridium difficile on the healthcare system.Clinical infectious diseases,55(suppl 2), S88-S92. Legido-Quigley, H., Otero, L., la Parra, D., Alvarez-Dardet, C., Martin-Moreno, J. M., McKee, M. (2013). Will austerity cuts dismantle the Spanish healthcare system?.Bmj,346. Zimlichman, E., Henderson, D., Tamir, O., Franz, C., Song, P., Yamin, C. K., ... Bates, D. W. (2013). Health careassociated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system.JAMA internal medicine,173(22), 2039-2046.